Static Atlanta Blackstar Content Uploads 2014 Australian Aborigines
Abstract
In meeting the social and emotional learning (SEL) needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students, the capacities of schoolhouse staff are critical. There is very limited evidence for relevant capacity development initiatives. This evaluation reports a multicomponent SEL preparation intervention delivered to staff of an Australian education service that operates independently of any particular schoolhouse to aid with the transitions of students from remote communities to boarding schools. A participatory action research (PAR) approach was implemented over 13-months with 21 staff participants. Results from a pre-, mid- and six months post-training survey and staff interviews were analysed and fed back through reflective group discussions. The training was associated with improved staff attitudes to mental wellness and skills to support student wellbeing. Sixteen participants received a 3rd qualification. Despite 'working in challenging environments', staff were 'dedicated to aid' students, and 'best-selling the need for modify' to better back up student wellbeing. However, given the service's brokering role betwixt families and schools, fewer staff members reported feeling empowered to influence issues in their workplace. The evaluation demonstrated the value of SEL training for education staff and potential utility for school teachers and boarding staff who accept direct duty of care for Indigenous students. The multicomponent training described in this written report would need to be condensed for school settings.
Background
School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs offer significant returns for the resources and time investment (Banerjee, Weare, & Farr, Reference Banerjee, Weare and Farr2013), and are now existence considered a more significant determinant of academic attainment than intelligence quotients (IQ) (Duckworth & Seligman, Reference Duckworth and Seligman2005). School SEL interventions have the potential to better students' health and wellbeing and boost bookish achievement (Durlak, Weissberg, Dymnicki, Taylor, & Schellinger, Reference Durlak, Weissberg, Dymnicki, Taylor and Schellinger2011; Murray, Low, Hollis, Cantankerous, & Davis, Reference Murray, Low, Hollis, Cross and Davis2007). SEL refers to the procedure of acquiring and effectively applying the noesis, attitudes and skills necessary to understand and manage emotions, ready and achieve positive goals, feel and show empathy for others, found and maintain positive relationships and make responsible decisions (Brooks, Reference Brooks2014). Evidence shows that such programs improve individual student competencies such as conviction about learning, a 'growth mindset' to persist when faced with challenges (Aronson, Reference Aronson2002), goal setting, stress management (Duckworth & Seligman, Reference Duckworth and Seligman2005) and problem-solving skills (Brooks, Reference Brooks2014). SEL programs take besides influenced the culture, values and environments of schools, and the quality and nature of relationships between students and teachers and students with peers (Brooks, Reference Brooks2014). For students, these competencies can engender a sense of belonging and engagement in school that influences their readiness to learn (Flook, Repetti, & Ullman, Reference Flook, Repetti and Ullman2005; Wang & Holcombe, Reference Wang and Holcombe2010). School SEL programs also reduce the likelihood that psychosocial distress volition progress mental disease through early on identification of its signs and symptoms (Kalra et al., Reference Kalra, Christodoulou, Jenkins, Tsipas, Christodoulou, Lecic-Tosevski and Bhugra2011). Early identification is important because 75% of mental illness manifests past historic period 24 (Kessler et al., Reference Kessler, Berglund, Demler, Jin, Merikangas and Walters2005) and individualised primary healthcare and specialist service responses to mental disease are ofttimes poorly coordinated and resourced (McGorry, 2017).
Important in supporting students' SEL are the capacities of schoolhouse and didactics support staff. These capacities include the extent to which staff feels empowered and supported to undertake SEL initiatives, their attitudes to mental health, and their skills to support students. These environmental, attitudinal and skills-based factors influence how they collaborate with, provide opportunities for, and help recognise and back up a student who is distressed (Centers for Affliction Control and Prevention Substance Abuse and Mental Wellness Services Administration et al., 2012). Staff members' mental health literacy or attitudes toward mental illness also frame how they experience and limited their own emotional problems and psychological distress, and whether they disclose these symptoms and seek care (Ajzen & Fishbein, Reference Ajzen and Fishbein1980; Jorm et al., Reference Jorm, Korten, Jacomb, Christensen, Rodgers and Pollitt1997). Supporting staff to feel confident and effective when engaging with students is central to instilling pedagogical change, edifice cultural competency and creating a welcoming, and inclusive school climate (Gower & Byrne, Reference Gower, Byrne, Beresford, Partington and Gower2012). For example, an Australian whole of schoolhouse SEL program to encourage engagement and interaction between teachers, parents, families, customs and students demonstrated a significant increase in resilience for students experiencing depression, anxiety and emotional difficulties, which was maintained 12 months after the plan was completed (Worsley, Reference Worsley, Prince-Embury and Saklofske2014).
Some schools attempt to provide SEL support to help students to realise their total potential, but have inadequate knowledge of appropriate models, or resources and grooming to meet this goal (Heyeres, McCalman, Bainbridge, & Redman-MacLaren, Reference Heyeres, McCalman, Bainbridge and Redman-MacLaren2016). For schools with culturally diverse populations, there is an fifty-fifty greater dearth of literature about how staff can best support SEL for students in culturally proficient means. When working with Ancient and Torres Strait Islander (time to come respectfully termed Indigenous) students, for example, equally many as one in four Western Australian Ancient children (4–17 years) showed signs of serious emotional or behavioural difficulties compared to 15% for non-Ancient children (Zubrick et al., Reference Zubrick, Silburn, Lawrence, Mitrou, Dalby, Blair and Cox2005). School staff then frequently struggle to meet the complex SEL needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (future respectfully termed Ethnic) students (Heyeres et al., Reference Heyeres, McCalman, Bainbridge and Redman-MacLaren2016).
For boarding schools in detail, staff are required to support transitioning students who face separation from family at x or 11 years of age; often college academic standards; changes in prescribed roles, responsibilities, and expectations; Western cultural and linguistic norms; and potential institutional discrimination and racism (McCalman et al., Reference McCalman, Bainbridge, Russo, Rutherford, Tsey, Wenitong and Jacups2016; Stewart, Reference Stewart2015). Teachers at four Western Australian boys' boarding schools, for example, reported that while boarding schools presented Ethnic students with academic and social opportunities; student'southward also experienced challenges such as culture stupor, homesickness, literacy and numeracy bug, prejudice and racism. Several of these teachers questioned whether their schools had the power to support the learning needs of Ethnic boarding students; while some worried that educational aspirations for these students were lower than for non-Indigenous students. Positive relationships betwixt staff and students, staff and parents, and school and community were perceived as critical to Indigenous students' success at school.
Many Indigenous students are compelled to nourish secondary boarding schools because in that location is no secondary education provision in their home communities. At that place is a pressing need for whole of school culturally proficient SEL environments, nevertheless many remote Indigenous students experience boarding school environments equally a privileged educational and learning context inside which they question their own belonging. Not only are at that place differences from their familiar primary school environments in school size; proportion of non-Indigenous students; uniforms; cultural cues and means of being, knowing and doing; expectations; routines; food; weather; racket; population density; and language; the already difficult transitions to boarding school are fabricated even harder by prejudice and overt and covert racism. For boarding schools to exist places in which Aboriginal students experience rubber and confident to express a sense of self and cultural identity, supportive environments and school practices need to exist created that positively embrace complexity and diversity and where unacceptable attitudes and behaviours exhibited by staff and students are redressed. Hence, professional chapters development is of import for boarding school staff to foster empathy with the significance of culture to Aboriginal boarding students and to develop skills for addressing their SEL needs.
A contempo search of the Canadian, Australian, New Zealand and United States (CANZUS nations) literature found limited evidence of tailored staff chapters development initiatives to meet the SEL needs of Ethnic students' from CANZUS nations in boarding/ residential schools (Heyeres et al., Reference Heyeres, McCalman, Bainbridge and Redman-MacLaren2016). An Australian Authorities written report identified the need for boosted back up for already qualified staff as beingness of high importance (DEST, 2010). To improve culturally respectful education and practices, cultural sensation workshops programs accept been provided in schools, led by experienced Indigenous educators and complemented by the interest of Indigenous Elders and artists (Barr, Reference Barr2009; DEST, 2010). Other strategies to raise staff empowerment, attitudes to mental health and student support skills entailed professional person feedback, supervision and counselling sessions (DEST, 2010; Meredith & Ryan, Reference Meredith and Ryan2014), mentoring (Mander & Fieldhouse, Reference Mander and Fieldhouse2009), networking (Mander & Fieldhouse, Reference Mander and Fieldhouse2009), and professional person supervision (Meredith & Ryan, Reference Meredith and Ryan2014). But all studies were descriptive and none focused primarily on ways to enhance staff capacity to support Indigenous students (Heyeres et al., Reference Heyeres, McCalman, Bainbridge and Redman-MacLaren2016).
This paper reports an evaluation of a multicomponent SEL staff capacity enhancement grooming intervention with members of an Australian education service that works independently from any detail school to broker the transitions of Ethnic students from remote communities to boarding schools. The aim of the SEL training was to inform the enhancement of the service's case management arroyo to amend advocate for and support the wellbeing of Indigenous students who attend boarding schools. The enquiry question was: Does SEL training influence the capacity of teaching staff to advocate for and support Indigenous student wellbeing?
Methods
Written report Pattern
This enquiry responds to needs identified past an Australian education service for enhanced support for Indigenous students' concrete, social, emotional and cultural wellbeing, including reducing the risk of suicide. Consequent with the definition of Ancient health from the National Health Strategy in 1989, wellbeing was considered broadly to be: 'not only the physical wellbeing of an individual but . . . the social, emotional and cultural wellbeing of the whole community in which each individual is able to achieve their full potential as a man existence' (AH&MRC, 2017, p. 3).
A strengths-based participatory activity research (PAR) approach founded on social constructivism was practical (Burr, Reference Burr2003; McCashen, Reference McCashen2005). PAR has been established as an acceptable and feasible approach for research with Indigenous people; it promotes sustainability, mutual trust and respect in the human relationship, partnerships, ownership and empowerment in the process, and benefits to the inquiry population (Bainbridge, McCalman, Tsey, & Brown, Reference Bainbridge, McCalman, Tsey and Brown2011; McCalman, McEwan, & Tsey, Reference McCalman, McEwan and Tsey2009; McCalman et al., Reference McCalman, Tsey, Bainbridge, Shakeshaft, Doran and Abudeen2013; Tsey & Every, Reference Tsey and Every2000; Tsey et al., Reference Tsey, Whiteside, Daley, Deemal, Gibson, Cadet-James and Haswell-Elkins2004). Participation of the education staff was embedded in all aspects of the research to ensure user capacity-development, appointment and ownership, besides as immediate translation of the inquiry results into practice (Bainbridge et al., Reference Bainbridge, McCalman, Tsey and Brownish2011; McCalman et al., Reference McCalman, Tsey, Bainbridge, Shakeshaft, Doran and Abudeen2013; Tsey & Every, Reference Tsey and Every2000). The evaluation of the SEL training utilised a sequential, complementary mixed methods design (Teddlie & Tashakkori, Reference Teddlie and Tashakkori2009). Data for the evaluation was gathered from the following: (1) Three waves of surveys, administered pretraining, later on the initial training modules, and vi months after the final training modules had been delivered; (2) reflective grouping discussions; and (3) private interviews with service staff.
Setting of the Study
An Indigenous education support service (the service) was adult as a grass roots response from three remote communities to the needs of students for support in their transitions to boarding schools. The service now supports more than 500 students and families from 12 remote detached Ethnic communities to transition to boarding schools. An evaluation of the service found that staff roles were demanding and complex, with some officers willing to go across what was expected to ensure that students' on-going and complex needs were met. The capacity of staff members to deal with situations as they arose was considered to be essential to students' succeeding and higher retentiveness rates. It was recognised that on-going professional development was necessary, especially for customs support staff (Department of Didactics and Preparation, 2010).
At the fourth dimension of study initiation (May 2015), the service had 21 staff members who were spread geographically across one state. They worked across three service areas: primary into secondary schoolhouse transition; secondary school transition; and re-engagement for students who were excluded from boarding school. In the primary into secondary school area, staff worked with principal school (years 6/7) students and their families to assistance them to utilize to and take up placement at a boarding school, and support all student boarders in Years 8–12 to return to school each term on time. In the secondary school surface area, staff including youth mentors supported students enrolled at boarding schools to manage transition challenges and to develop opportunities that atomic number 82 to Yr 12 attainment (or equivalent) and to pathways across Year 12. 1 staff fellow member supported students who were de-enrolled from boarding schools to re-engage in learning or earning pathways. In add-on to working with students, staff engaged with and between families, boarding schools and houses, and other services (east.one thousand., social services, airlines and other send services, health services) to support students' adjustment, orientation and ongoing stay at boarding schools.
Staff Training Intervention and Processes
The SEL training comprised 3 distinct but complementary training packages: Family unit Wellbeing Programme (FWB), Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health Offset Aid (MHFA) and Resilience Training. These three components were called by the university researchers and co-researchers from the service in response to staff identified need to focus on both the run a risk and protective factors for mental health (Robinson, Silburn, & Leckning, Reference Robinson, Silburn and Leckning2012). Hence, equally described below, FWB and Resilience training offered SEL competencies for navigating Indigenous wellbeing, while MHFA promoted awareness and early identification of risk. Grooming was followed past reflective PAR sessions with all staff members. The training was funded every bit role of the research study.
Family unit Wellbeing Training
The premise of FWB as a SEL program is that all human beings have basic physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual needs and failure to satisfy these needs results in behavioural problems (Tsey & Every, Reference Tsey and Every2000). FWB was adult by an Aboriginal Didactics service to enhance the capacity and wellbeing of service staff and community members. The plan was designed equally a reflective and interactive pocket-size group grooming within which participants are able to raise their concerns, identify their strengths, build relationships and gain new skills through reflection on experience. The reflective nature of the program was ideally suited to participatory quality improvement processes. FWB has a sound evidence-base of operations in group and community SEL efforts that work to collectively identify personal and community strengths and needs such as health and education improvement (Tsey & Every, Reference Tsey and Every2000; Tsey et al., Reference Tsey, Whiteside, Daley, Deemal, Gibson, Cadet-James and Haswell-Elkins2004; Tsey et al., Reference Tsey, Whiteside, Haswell-Elkins, Bainbridge, Cadet-James and Wilson2010). Qualified facilitators were bachelor inside the research team.
The agreement between the service and the research squad was to administer the introductory sections (thirty h) of the accredited FWB program. The offset two sections 'understanding self and improving personal interactions' and 'coping with grief and loss' were delivered in May 2015. Upon completion, the service requested training in the full certificate Ii in FWB Facilitation. The boosted half dozen sections plus a facilitators' training skill set were administered in the following months and ended in December 2015. Subsequent stages of FWB focused on managing emotions, managing stress, communicating effectively, deepening the understanding and recognition of psychological health. The commencement four sections of FWB training were delivered by an Indigenous researcher/facilitator who was supported by an Indigenous and a non-Ethnic researcher/facilitator; the last four were co-facilitated by staff members in lodge to build/demonstrate facilitation skills.
Ancient and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health First Aid Training
Ancient and Torres Strait Islander MHFA grooming was selected to increase service staffs' mental health literacy and knowledge of appropriate MHFA strategies that were sensitive to experiences of Indigenous people (MHFA Australia, 2008). The xiv-h programme covered topics on social and emotional wellbeing; mental wellness problems in community and Australian youth; adolescent evolution; anxiety; depression; suicide and nonsuicidal self-injury; psychosis and self-care. The training culminated in examination of the five-betoken Action Plan acronym ALGEE: Approach the person, appraise and assistance with whatsoever crunch; Listen nonjudgmentally; Give support and information; Encourage the person to get advisable professional assistance; Encourage other supports. The training was delivered in May 2015 past 2 Indigenous facilitators through interactive presentations, video instance studies, group exercises and the utilise of a transmission.
Resilience Training
A ane-twenty-four hour period resilience-training workshop was facilitated for service staff and partner organisations, including schools and health services, in October 2015. The workshop was facilitated by international resilience enquiry leader, Professor Michael Ungar from the Resilience Research Center at Dalhousie Academy, Canada, and encompassed handouts, group exercises and video recordings of case studies to demonstrate ways to nurture resilience in young people (Ungar, Reference Ungar2012). Resilience is defined: 'in the context of exposure to significant arduousness'. . . as 'both the capacity of individuals to navigate their manner to psychological, social, cultural, and physical resources that sustain their wellbeing, and their chapters individually and collectively to negotiate for these resources to be provided and experienced in culturally meaningful ways' (Ungar, Reference Ungar2012). Resilience theory has increasingly explored understandings of why some youth who feel arduousness are able to overcome hardship and display positive developmental outcomes (Wilson & Gauvin, Reference Wilson and Gauvin2012; Zimmerman et al., Reference Zimmerman, Stoddard, Eisman, Caldwell, Aiyer and Miller2013). Schoolhouse-based outcomes of resilience programs have demonstrated increased noesis, improved attitudes to mental affliction and suicide, lowered suicide try rates, and enhanced adaptive attitudes about low and suicide postintervention (Endmost the Gap Clearinghouse, 2013; Isle of mann et al., Reference Mann, Apter, Bertolote, Beautrais, Currier, Haas and Hendin2005; Tsey et al., Reference Tsey, Whiteside, Daley, Deemal, Gibson, Buck-James and Haswell-Elkins2004). Studies have also found that improving problem solving, coping with stress, and increasing resilience enhanced the protective factors confronting suicide (Mann et al., Reference Isle of man, Apter, Bertolote, Beautrais, Currier, Haas and Hendin2005; Zimmerman, Reference Zimmerman2010). For Indigenous students, having the resilience to make good for you adjustments in times of high vulnerability is vital to maintaining their wellbeing.
Service Function and Participants
The role of the education support service was to support remote-dwelling Indigenous families to gain a boarding school placement for their child and to banker the transitions of students to have upwardly a placement and to complete the secondary phase of schooling. As a brokering service, staff members had no directly mandate over student wellbeing; rather, their influence was enacted indirectly and informally through advocacy via established relationships with families, students and schools.
All 21 service staff participated in the multicomponent SEL training. The cohort was diverse in roles, ethnicity, gender, historic period and chapters. It comprised: the service managing director, 14 field staff, vi youth mentors. 8 were Indigenous and 13 non-Indigenous participants. Their ages included 10 under 35 years and 11 over 35 years; and 18 were female and 3 were male. Well-nigh of the field staff were trained teachers, vocational guidance counsellors or public servants; all had considerable experience in working with Indigenous students, families and schools. None of the youth mentors and two other staff members yet had formal tertiary qualifications. Staff turnover during the seven-month training menstruum (May–December 2015) meant that 5 participants discontinued the grooming and two new staff members joined the cohort at different stages. Catch-up classes were provided to ensure maximum participation and graduation from the grooming.
Data Drove and Analysis
Data were co-generated with all service staff who participated in the training through a survey, reflective group discussions, and individual interviews. The survey was administered pre-, mid- and six months mail-training to determine changes in: (1) staff empowerment; (2) staff attitudes to mental health and (3) staff skills to support students' wellbeing (Table one). It was too intended that the survey findings be used in reflective group discussions with service staff to place aspects of service practice that could be enhanced and strategies for enhancing the service model of student support.
Table 1 Timeline for Grooming and Data Drove
Survey Items
Survey development was informed by a brief review of the literature, conducted to identify appropriate scales and instruments to mensurate the service environment (workplace empowerment), staff attitudes to mental health, and staff skills to support student wellbeing. Potential items were assessed utilising Searles, Whiteside, McCalman, Tsey, and Doran (Reference Searles, Whiteside, McCalman, Tsey and Doran2012) criteria; that they should correspond the issues that they were supposed to measure out, take reasonable sensitivity to modify, be based on evidence, easily interpreted and allow comparison over time. A further requirement to constrain the length of the questionnaire meant that only a limited number of items were included.
Workplace empowerment
To assess the service environment, questions relating to workplace empowerment were adjusted from the Growth and Empowerment Measure (GEM) (Haswell et al., Reference Haswell, Kavanagh, Tsey, Reilly, Cadet-James, Laliberte and Doran2010). The Jewel is a validated tool for measuring the outcome of empowerment (Emotional Empowerment Scales, α = .891). Information technology had particular relevance to the staff training because it originated from evaluations of the FWB program (Haswell et al., Reference Haswell, Kavanagh, Tsey, Reilly, Cadet-James, Laliberte and Doran2010). Respondents were asked: Thinking near your piece of work in the service, to what extent are you able to: feel condom; feel respected in my workplace; feel empowered in my workplace; speak out and exist heard; understand my role; and undertake further learning. Items were assessed on a five-point Likert scale.
Attitudes to mental wellness
To determine mental health literacy, participants were asked to signal their level of agreement with nine statements. 4 statements were drawn from the depression stigma scale (Griffiths, Christensen, & Jorm, Reference Griffiths, Christensen and Jorm2008): mental illness is a sign of personal weakness; people with a mental disease could snap out of their illness, people with mental affliction are dangerous, and people with mental disease tend to be unpredictable. Responses were compared to 'correct' answers obtained through experts' consensus (Hadlaczky, Hökby, Mkrtchian, Carli, & Wasserman, Reference Hadlaczky, Hökby, Mkrtchian, Carli and Wasserman2014). 1 statement assessed respondents' perceived injunctive norms toward persons with mental illness: people are generally caring and sympathetic to people with mental illness (Centers for Affliction Control and Prevention Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration et al., 2012). One statement assessed behavior almost the effectiveness of handling methods: handling tin can aid people with mental illness pb normal lives (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Assistants et al., 2012). Ii statements from the social distance scale were likewise included: I am willing to help a student with a mental wellness event, and I am willing to socially interact with a person with a mental disease (Link, Phelan, Bresnahan, Stueve, & Pescosolido, Reference Link, Phelan, Bresnahan, Stueve and Pescosolido1999). All items were assessed on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from strong agreement to strong disagreement, with a neutral choice equally the midpoint.
Pupil support skills
As mentioned, service staff had no straight responsibility to support student wellbeing, just did so through their established relationships with families, students and schools. Questions related to staff members' skills to back up student wellbeing were likewise adapted from Gem scenarios (Haswell et al., Reference Haswell, Kavanagh, Tsey, Reilly, Cadet-James, Laliberte and Doran2010). Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which they were able to make changes to the way they did their work, had skillful relationships with colleagues, students, families and other people; and dealt with crises. Additional dimensions of wellbeing were adapted from the standard FWB evaluation survey (Searles et al., Reference Searles, Whiteside, McCalman, Tsey and Doran2012). These were the ability to: cope with mean solar day-to-day things, bargain positively with conflict, exist a leader, and support pupil resilience. Questions were modified to focus on students specifically, rather than people generally, to arrange the context of the participants.
For workplace empowerment and attitudes regarding mental health, participants responded using a five-point Likert calibration with five anchors: no effect, niggling effect, some effect, much effect or major issue. Dichotomous (yep/no) responses were used to signal the actions used to back up students talking about mental health concerns, and pupil support skills.
Typhoon versions of the questionnaire were circulated to the service management for feedback; they indicated that the questionnaire addressed their needs. The staff survey was administered pretraining (May 2015); immediately after the initial five days of FWB phase 1 and MHFA training (May 2015); and and so completed past xiii remaining participating staff six months-post completion of the total training course in June 2016.
Cogitating Group Discussions and Interviews
Preliminary findings from the survey for workplace empowerment, staff attitudes to mental wellness and skills to support students, were shared in two reflective group discussions at the completion of the starting time 5-day training period and a month thereafter (June 2015). Service staff were asked to reverberate on the meaning of their responses to the survey statements in terms of what was working well in the provision of student support, what was not working well, and how student support strategies could be improved. 5 individual interviews with service staff members were also conducted three months post-obit the completion of grooming; this added to the richness of qualitative data.
Data Analysis
Survey information were manually entered into Microsoft Excel, then exported to SPSS Version 24 (IBM Organisation) for analysis. Descriptive and nonparametric tests were used to examine the data because of the nonnormal distribution of the variables. Differences between the subsamples who left the service and those who remained were examined.
Reflective group discussions and interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. The transcripts were thematically analysed. Following Braun and Clarke (Reference Braun and Clarke2006), a six-phased process was used: (1) familiarisation with data; (2) generating initial codes; (3) searching for repeated patterns of meaning or themes; (4) reviewing themes; (5) defining and naming themes and (6) producing the paper. These phases were not applied lineally, but rather, in that location was a constant moving dorsum and frontwards between the data sets, coded extracts of data, and the analysis. Ii of the authors read all information; one generated initial codes using open up coding methods in NVIVO viii qualitative inquiry software. Preliminary themes were identified and compared by discussion between three authors until consensus on key themes was reached. These themes were then defined and named, and used as subheadings to write the findings of the paper. Because of the small numbers and potential identifiability of private staff, no descriptors for staff are provided for quotes. A comparison of the two data sources then enabled focus on consistencies and inconsistencies, interpretation and identification of ways forrad toward improved pupil support.
Results from Statistical Analysis
Workplace Empowerment
Workplace empowerment was assessed by 14 items using a 5-point Likert calibration. No meaning differences were found between participants who remained at the service and those who left prior to the final survey. Pretraining scores across nigh indicators indicated the workplace having a positive consequence (much effect), and afterward potential effect changes were modest. Overall scores for each indicator are shown in Tabular array 2. Pocket-sized sustained improvements (at post survey time period) were achieved for coping, planning for the future, conviction in supporting students' resilience and understanding their function inside the organisation. Scores remained steady for dealing positively with disharmonize, leadership ability, relationships, crisis management and feeling heard in the workplace. Small declines in effect occurred for feeling condom in their employment, interest in farther learning, respect in the workplace, empowerment and making improvements.
Tabular array 2 Means and Standard Deviations (SD) of Workplace Empowerment Indicators at Each Measurement Point
Attitudes to Mental Health
Staff attitudes to mental wellness were assessed by nine items using a 5-point Likert calibration. Some items should exist considered to be opposite coded, in that a lower score indicates an attitude more consistent with knowledge of mental wellness issues. No meaning differences were found between participants who remained in the service and those who left prior to the final survey.
Overall indicators for attitudes to mental health are shown in Table 3. Small improvements in agreement and attitudes toward mental health were noted for most indicators. Social distance assessment, willingness to interact socially with a person with a mental wellness upshot, remained static at a strong understanding of 4.5 from pre- to post-training. Confidence in approaching and helping a student that seems to take a mental health trouble increased from 3.4 to 4.1. Items from the depression stigma scale, three of which are reverse coded, also improved with declines in the mean level of agreement for iii of the items.
Tabular array 3 Means and Standard Deviations (SD) of Attitudes to Mental Health Indicators at Each Measurement Point
Skills to Back up Students
Educatee support skills were reported using a self-assessment of participants' current capacity in fourteen areas with a dichotomous response. Actions taken when talking about mental health concerns were similarly reported using a dichotomous response. No significant differences were constitute between participants who remained in the service and those who left prior to the final survey.
Overall indicators for educatee support skills are shown at Table 4. A number of skills showed a small decrease in confidence immediately following the initial training, with a return to the pretraining level of conviction, or close to information technology, in the mail-training assessment. This occurred for skills relating to supporting students' resilience in terms of their relationships, identifying trustworthy adults or peers, independence, credence, managing feelings, personality and construction of boarding business firm. Conviction in some skills macerated beyond the iii time periods. This occurred for skills relating to supporting students' resilience in terms of their cocky-esteem, advice, problem solving, and empathy.
Tabular array four Percentage of Staff Understanding for Student Support Skills Indicators at Each Measurement Point
Participants also reported on the actions they had taken while talking well-nigh mental health concerns in the previous six months. Details of the actions for the six months prior to the initial training, and the vi months after the completion of training are shown in Tabular array 5. No significant differences were found betwixt participants who remained in the service and those who left prior to the terminal survey. Overall in that location was an increase in the use of a number of strategies when talking with students most mental health concerns. Increased use of self-help strategies, reference to books and websites, provision of general data and provision of service information were reported. Time spent listening, and making appointments maintained a similar level.
Table 5 Percentage of Participants Reporting apply of Actions when Talking to Students Virtually Mental Health Concerns in Six Months Prior to Survey
Results from Thematic Analysis
Thematic analysis of service staff responses through reflective grouping discussions and private interviews to the baseline and postinitial training survey data revealed four key issues and suggestions for actions to address them. The four key themes were: working in challenging environments; being dedicated to help; acknowledging the need for change; and negotiating individual, squad and service responsibilities.
Working in Challenging Environments
The theme 'working in challenging environments' referred to the brokering role of the service as a link between community and schoolhouse. While this brokering role meant that service staff had close relationships with families, students and schools, at times of crisis, staff members often had express directly influence. Staff spoke of some boarding school environments in which disharmonize was a common characteristic of some students' schooling experiences. A staff member commented: 'It becomes very, very stressful with students, how they are dealt with at schools.' The challenges of being an abet for a pupil in some disharmonize situations, where neither the educatee nor service staff member felt that their voices are heard, created consequent stress for staff members. One said: 'The reality is that the situation is and so out of your command.' Another staff member said: 'it'due south hard to get outcomes, it'south difficult to become improvement and that can be quite draining, doing that kind of work'. Service staff suggested that they could take more than positive bear on in such situations by working more directly with boarding schools to enhance strengths-based practice in their support of remote Indigenous students.
Staff members too spoke of the needs of family members for back up to gain and take up boarding school placements for their children. Staff members were faced with high demand for their services provided when in remote communities. I said: 'When we go into community, particularly when we are merely there for two or three or iv times a term, the flood of requests! . . . We say yes to basically everybody and deal with it every bit we go'. Staff members likewise noted the rewarding nature of their relationships with family members.
Being Dedicated to Help
Staff members spoke of their personal and professional dedication to the work of supporting remote Indigenous students. Staff members knew the families and students, and saw their roles as beingness an advocate; a support; a link between student and schoolhouse and family. The roles of staff members were therefore broad and the nature of support that was offered to students did not fit a formal prescribed program. Rather, staff members spoke of being bachelor: 'One said: '. . .it's not talking at kids, its being with kids. . . when it's with immature people, I'k in that location helping their families and being with them'. Ane staff fellow member described an element of her role every bit 'supporting students to accept responsibilities and believe that their deportment tin can brand a difference. . . feel that they have what information technology takes to accomplish and experience strong themselves . . .'. Inside their duty of care to student needs, staff members were daily or weekly called upon to manage crises, simply could only respond within the bounds of their defined relationships with individual schools. While staff members spoke of the want to use all-time practice such as skills adult within the FWB plan, in exercise, they recounted that they were not necessarily given the opportunity to respond equally such, because the duty of care lies with schools.
Acknowledging the Need for Change
Staff members discussed the demand for alter at three levels: individually, every bit a team and systemically. A staff member reflected: 'information technology feels like there is multiple levels in which at that place tin can exist responses to these things.' Staff members considered that individual responsibility for changes to work practices required reflection on how to build resilience and mental wellness awareness into practice. Staff members considered that while information technology was not advisable or viable to deliver the lengthy FWB, MHFA and resilience training as a whole to boarding school staff or students, they did incorporate useful elements and frameworks. Staff members also considered that capacity enhancement was better suited within private schools for staff members, every bit they are well placed with direct and daily access to students.
Staff members also considered that the service'due south individual case management approach could be enhanced to better support student wellbeing. A staff fellow member suggested: 'there are solutions or strategies in what people are . . . already doing well, nosotros can do more than of that. . . together'. Another staff member said: 'hopefully this framework, FWB training, will help u.s. to plan, focused activities with our kids'. Specific service-level responses suggested included the identification and communication of reasonable expectations of the service role to external stakeholders.
Negotiating Individual, Team and Service Responsibilities
The theme of 'negotiating private, team and service responsibilities' referred to staff members' consideration of the extent to which their coping was an individual versus collective or service-level responsibility, and the attitudinal and physical changes that needed to be enacted to better support the coping of individual staff members. Discussions highlighted the need for routine debriefing, connecting and checking in mechanisms. For case, one staff member reflected appreciatively on a FWB activity where: 'we had to say what we were going to do to assistance ourselves in our daily life, and so we had a buddy to follow upwards on. . . I really appreciated information technology.' Another suggested: 'some third political party to have a yarn with, outside of work'.
Service staff members also discussed how they could pool their collective do noesis to amend back up student resilience. One said: 'if you look at the principles and goals of Indigenous Leadership Programme that they resonate so much in the goals of FWB and also with some of the key principles of Australian Stronger Smarter. And then information technology'southward like there are synergies.' The value of encompassing learnings from other sources was acknowledged.
Formal service policy responses to stressful circumstances were likewise considered. Awarding of learnings from FWB, MHFA and resilience grooming resulted in further PAR planning workshops to drive the service's model of pupil support from a case management to a resilience arroyo. The aim was to provide back up and capacity enhancement to schools to provide more supportive environments for students, and with students and families to encourage negotiation of their day-to-twenty-four hour period challenges. Every bit mentioned above, the constraints for service staff members in their indirect brokerage roles and resultant limited chapters to support student wellbeing in the environments within which students lived and learned were conspicuously identified during the SEL training. It was considered that boarding school staff who piece of work on the ground every day with students would benefit more from receiving SEL training.
Outcomes
The preparation resulted in 16 staff members, some of whom did non have prior tertiary qualifications, obtaining a certificate two qualification in FWB. This qualification allowed for facilitation of the program to others. Nevertheless, service staff members considered that it would not exist feasible for further SEL preparation in schools to encompass the full 120 h certificate 2 training. Subsequently, service staff members worked to arrange the service's individual example management approach. SEL capacity development initiatives were developed for boarding school teachers and residential staff. This initiative comprised half mean solar day planning sessions, identification of 'Step Up' plans whereby schools chose a strengths-based initiative for better supporting remote Indigenous boarding school students, and online professional development grooming in trauma-based intendance besides every bit strengths-based approaches.
Strengths and Limitations
A strength of the study was the high participation rate of service staff members – all agreed to participate. However, the modest staff numbers, and subsequent sample size meant that there was insufficient power to undertake a number of statistical analyses. At that place was also a loftier compunction of participants, which meant that the sample at six months differed from that of the consequent pre- and mid- grooming sample. Such high attrition rates take been noted in other studies of the upshot of MHFA training (Jensen, Morthorst, Vendsborg, Hjorthøj, & Nordentoft, Reference Jensen, Morthorst, Vendsborg, Hjorthøj and Nordentoft2016; Kitchener & Jorm, Reference Kitchener and Jorm2004). Results from the items for 'use of actions when talking to students' should exist interpreted with caution equally there was no mensurate of the opportunity (number of students participants spoke to about mental wellness concerns) or appropriateness of individual deportment to each state of affairs. A further limitation of the report is the impact of broader structural changes to the plan environment that occurred at a point during the study period that may have had a negative touch on some measures.
Discussion
Overall there was a consistency of findings between the quantitative and qualitative elements of the evaluation. Both elements of the evaluation highlighted the challenging nature of service staff roles in advocating for students' educational and wellbeing outcomes beyond customs and school environments in which the service has only indirect influence. The service staff, while confident in their abilities, recognised the limitations of their positions within the broader context of the students' lives. The students' themselves are navigating complex environments and service staff are restricted, since they are staff members of a brokering service with no directly jurisdiction or duty of care over pupil education or and have limited admission and influence in how they can support the students. Furthermore, they identified potential changes at individual, service and organisation levels that could enhance the development of pupil's resilience.
Staff reported consistently high scores for their leadership, relationships and ability to bargain with conflict. Their already high levels of coping, confidence in supporting students, ability to bargain with crisis and conviction in supporting student resilience increased; as did their understandings of their function. This is consistent with previous evaluations that have found FWB and Resilience preparation components were associated with improved skills to better support student wellbeing (Tsey & Every, Reference Tsey and Every2000; Tsey et al., Reference Tsey, Whiteside, Haswell-Elkins, Bainbridge, Cadet-James and Wilson2010). However, there was a reduction in the level of support for the statements: 'feel rubber', 'feel respected', 'feel empowered', 'able to speak out and be heard', and 'would like to undertake further learning'. In a speedily changing work surroundings, these changes were attributed to the broader structural factors at play in the work environment.
While the level of confidence staff had in their overall power to support students' resilience increased post-grooming and was maintained to the post-training survey, a number of individual skills showed a reduction in confidence immediately following the initial training. This is unsurprising as participants' understanding of the complication and challenges of the situation were increased by the interactive grooming sessions. Over the ensuing 12 months, the level of confidence recovered for a number of skills, but declined farther for some. The pattern of recovery and turn down for these items supports an increased understanding by participants of the challenges of the broader structural environment and limitations of their roles. The statements that showed recovery in levels of confidence reflected supports that the service staff could have more than influence over, such as developing the students' support networks, skills, attitudes and practical noesis, while the statements that declined in levels of confidence reflected supports that the service staff had little control or influence over, such every bit empathy.
SEL training was associated with overall stiff improvements in service staff attitudes to mental health and skills to support students. It is highly likely that improvements to staff attitudes can exist owing to the MHFA component of the training. Improvements from pre- to six months post-training were found in the proportion of staff members who reported 'correct' answers to eight of the 9 attitudinal statements. The only statement where ambivalence was found was 'I am willing to socially interact with persons with a mental illness'. The results suggest that like studies of the furnishings of MHFA for other participant groups (Jensen et al., Reference Jensen, Morthorst, Vendsborg, Hjorthøj and Nordentoft2016; Kitchener & Jorm, Reference Kitchener and Jorm2004), for service staff, the MHFA training was associated with a reduction in the stigma of mental affliction and improved confidence in providing support for students suffering from mental disease.
Qualitative data from staff reflective group discussions and interviews demonstrated that for service staff, working in challenging environments to advocate for Indigenous student wellbeing was personally stressful. Staff members acknowledged the demand for modify. However, some staff members felt that negotiations of individual, team and service responsibilities were required. Other studies take besides documented challenging and complex change processes inside Indigenous service organisations, which become through processes of stagnation, preparation, activity and review (e.1000. McEwan, Tsey, McCalman, & Travers, Reference McEwan, Tsey, McCalman and Travers2010).
This paper outlines the effects of a staff capacity development and quality comeback approach in one service. The multicomponent training program represented a considerable investment of 140 h of training for service staff members. Such extensive training is unlikely to be practicable for boarding schoolhouse staff members, simply an abbreviated version, which incorporates only the first stage of the FWP along with the MHFA and Resilience training components, could be tailored for the teaching, residential and pastoral staff of destination boarding schools. International evidence suggests that improving staff chapters is likely to improve the prevalence and quality of SEL approaches targeting students in schools (Durlak et al., Reference Durlak, Weissberg, Dymnicki, Taylor and Schellinger2011). Yet, in that location is very little published literature about how instruction staff can navigate the challenges of working across diverse environments and cultures to provide optimal SEL support for Indigenous students. Hence, there is little evidence to guide schools and related services about what types of preparation are likely to be effective in improving workplace empowerment and support, attitudes to mental health and educatee back up skills for supporting Ethnic students' transitions. Given the complexity of issues associated with implementing staff SEL training, every bit outlined in this paper, schools and support services need to be well resourced to implement such approaches.
Conclusions
The staff SEL training was associated with improved staff attitudes to mental health and skills to support educatee wellbeing. However, there was an overall decrease in the proportion of service staff members who felt empowered in their workplace over the 13-month study. Qualitative enquiry findings showed that despite 'working in challenging environments', service staff members are 'dedicated to aid' students, and 'acknowledged the need for change' to better back up educatee wellbeing. The improved staff attitudes to mental health and student back up skills associated with the multicomponent training plan volition provide a necessary resource for developing and implementing service improvement processes. Problems associated with planning and implementing change included the need to ensure 'negotiation of responsibilities at private, team and service levels'. Continual comeback of the evidence-informed SEL approach contributed to a subsequent shift in the focus of the service's case management arroyo to a formalised resilience approach that provides schools with enhanced SEL back up for Indigenous students' wellbeing.
Nigh the Authors
Marion Heyeres has a Bachelor of Social Science and is working as a Enquiry Officer for the Empowerment Team at James Cook University, Cairns. Her research interests include health, wellbeing and leadership.
Janya McCalman is a Co-leader for two cadre themes of the Center for Indigenous Health Equity Enquiry at Central Queensland University: the social and cultural determinants of wellness across the lifespan, and research translation and implementation. Her multimethod research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders partners over the terminal 15 years has spanned mental health, youth resilience, maternal and child health, health services and implementation research. She currently holds a 4-yr fellowship from Commonwealth of australia'due south National Wellness and Medical Research Council.
Erika Langham is a Lecturer in Health Promotion inside the Public Health Program and a researcher in the Centre for Indigenous Health Disinterestedness Inquiry at CQ University. She is a mixed methods researcher, and has undertaken research around wellness promotion and gambling. Erika'southward gambling research is centred on the experience of harm from gambling, the influence of environments, and the development of a scale to measure stigma associated with gambling. Her other research centres on force-based approaches to addressing complex health issues.
Roxanne Bainbridge is Director of the Eye for Indigenous Wellness Equity Inquiry at Central Queensland University. Her interest is in improving the integrity and quality of research bear witness as a contribution to the health and prosperity of Ethnic Australians. She holds a 4-year Fellowship from Australia's National Health and Medical Research Council and is a member of Lowitja Found's national committee on Community Adequacy and the Social Determinants of Health. Roxanne is a Gungarri adult female from Queensland, Australia.
Michelle Redman-MacLaren is Research Fellow and Theme Leader, Inquiry Capacity Strengthening in the Center for Indigenous Health Equity Research, CQUniversity. Michelle facilitates participatory, decolonising public health research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians and peoples of Solomon Islands and Papua New Guinea (PNG). As a social worker specialising in community evolution and human service management, Michelle has worked in rural, remote and international settings for 25 years. For her Ph.D., Michelle worked with women in PNG to explore HIV prevention. Current research interests include resilience of remote Indigenous boarding school students, and women'south feel of tuberculosis, HIV and climate change.
Amelia Britton has 12-years experience in educational activity working every bit a teacher and guidance officer in both individual and state schools in and out of remote Indigenous communities. Her most recent role was working with students excluded from boarding schools and their families around pathways to return to schoolhouse. She is at present working on further enquiry in alternate pathways for secondary students.
Katrina Rutherford is an experienced instructor, having worked in remote Indigenous communities for many years. Her about contempo role was working with chief school students and their families around pathways to boarding schools. She is now working on farther research in secondary student completions.
Komla Tsey is Tropical Leader (Social Science) at the Cairns Found, James Melt University (JCU) Cairns in Australia. Komla provides strategic leadership and support to academic staff and enquiry groups across different disciplines; mentors early career academics to get competitive researchers besides as provide guidance to research groups to build partnerships with relevant communities, services and industry sectors and evaluate the impacts and of their inquiry in response to growing authorities expectation for researchers to demonstrate the value of their enquiry. Current research interests include wellbeing promotion, leadership evolution, enquiry touch on cess, inquiry capacity development, and participatory learning past doing approaches to agreement and dealing with circuitous issues.
References
Ajzen, I. , & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Aronson, J. (2002). Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education. New York: Bookish Press.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, R. , McCalman, J. , Tsey, K. , & Brown, C. (2011). Inside-out approaches to promoting Ancient Australian wellbeing: Evidence from a decade of customs-based participatory research. The International Journal of Health, Health and Social club, 1 (2), 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, R. , Weare, K. , & Farr, W. (2013). Working with 'social and emotional aspects of learning' (SEAL): Assocations with school ethos, pupil social experiences, attendance and attainment. British Educational Inquiry Journal. doi:10.1002/berj.3114.Google Scholar
Braun, 5. , & Clarke, 5. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, iii, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, 5. (2003). Social constructionism (2d ed.). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Association of Canton Behavioral Health & Developmental Disability Directors, National Institute of Mental Wellness, & The Carter Center Mental Health Program. (2012). Attitudes toward mental illness: Results from the behavioral hazard factor surveillance system. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Command and Prevention. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/Mental_Health_Reports/pdf/BRFSS_Full%20Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. , & Seligman, M. (2005). Self-subject area out does IQ in predicting bookish performance of adolescents. Psychological Scientific discipline, 16, 939–944. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durlak, J.A. , Weissberg, R.P. , Dymnicki, A.B. , Taylor, R.D. , & Schellinger, 1000.B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Kid Development, 82 (1), 405–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flook, L. , Repetti, R. , & Ullman, J. (2005). Classroom social experiences as predictors of academic functioning. Developmental Psychology, 41, 319–327. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gower, G. , & Byrne, G. (2012). Becoming a culturally competent instructor: Kickoff the journeying. In Beresford, Q. , Partington, Chiliad. , & Gower, Chiliad. (Eds.), Reform and resistance in aboriginal education (pp. 379–402). Sussex: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, G.1000. , Christensen, H. , & Jorm, A.F. (2008). Predictors of depression stigma. BMC Psychiatry, 8 (1), 25. doi:10.1186/1471-244x-8-25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadlaczky, G. , Hökby, S. , Mkrtchian, A. , Carli, V. , & Wasserman, D. (2014). Mental health first aid is an effective public wellness intervention for improving cognition, attitudes, and behaviour: A meta-analysis. International Review of Psychiatry, 26 (4), 467–475. doi:10.3109/09540261.2014.924910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haswell, M.R. , Kavanagh, D. , Tsey, One thousand. , Reilly, Fifty. , Cadet-James, Y. , Laliberte, A. , . . . Doran, C. (2010). Psychometric validation of the growth and empowerment measure (Gem) applied with ethnic Australians. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 44 (ix), 791–799. doi:x.3109/00048674.2010.482919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyeres, M. , McCalman, J. , Bainbridge, R. , & Redman-MacLaren, M. (2016). Staff capacity evolution initiatives that support the well-existence of indigenous children in their transitions to boarding schools: A systematic scoping review. Frontiers in Educational activity, 2 (1). doi:10.3389/feduc.2017.00001.Google Scholar
Jensen, K.B. , Morthorst, B.R. , Vendsborg, P.B. , Hjorthøj, C. , & Nordentoft, Thousand. (2016). Effectiveness of mental wellness beginning aid preparation in Denmark: A randomized trial in waitlist blueprint. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 51 (4), 597–606. doi:10.1007/s00127-016-1176-ix.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorm, A. , Korten, A. , Jacomb, P. , Christensen, H. , Rodgers, B. , & Pollitt, P. (1997). Mental health literacy: A survey of the public's ability to recognize mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment. Medical Journal of Commonwealth of australia, 166 (4), 182–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalra, M. , Christodoulou, One thousand. , Jenkins, R. , Tsipas, Five. , Christodoulou, N. , Lecic-Tosevski, D. , . . . Bhugra, D. (2011). Mental health promotion: Guidance and strategies. European Psychiatry, 27 (2), 81–86. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.ten.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, R.C. , Berglund, P. , Demler, O. , Jin, R. , Merikangas, K.R. , & Walters, Eastward.E. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Archives of Full general Psychiatry, 62 (six), 593–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitchener, B.A. , & Jorm, A.F. (2004). Mental health first aid training in a workplace setting: A randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN13249129]. BMC Psychiatry, four (1), 23. doi:x.1186/1471-244x-4-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, B.Thousand. , Phelan, J.C. , Bresnahan, Thousand. , Stueve, A. , & Pescosolido, B.A. (1999). Public conceptions of mental illness: Labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance. American Journal of Public Wellness, 89. doi:ten.2105/ajph.89.nine.1328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, J.J. , Apter, A. , Bertolote, J. , Beautrais, A. , Currier, D. , Haas, A. , . . . Hendin, H. (2005). Suicide prevention strategies: A systematic review. Periodical of the American Medical Association, 294 (xvi), 2064–2074. doi:10.1001/jama.294.16.2064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCalman, J. , Bainbridge, R. , Russo, South. , Rutherford, K. , Tsey, K. , Wenitong, M. , . . . Jacups, S. (2016). Psycho-social resilience, vulnerability and suicide prevention: Impact evaluation of a mentoring arroyo to modify suicide hazard for remote Indigenous Australian students at boarding school. BMC Public Health, 16 (ane), one. doi:ten.1186/s12889-016-2762-1.Google ScholarPubMed
McCalman, J. , McEwan, A. , & Tsey, K. (2009). National suicide prevention strategy project – Building bridges report: Knowledge sharing between men's groups and the family Wellbeing empowerment program: Their function in community-based suicide prevention strategies. Retrieved 18 January 2017 from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/8768/.Google Scholar
McCalman, J. , Tsey, Grand. , Bainbridge, R. , Shakeshaft, A. , Doran, C. , & Abudeen, A. (2013). Tailoring a response to youth binge drinking in an Aboriginal Australian community: A grounded theory study. BMC Public Health, 13 (726). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCashen, Due west. (2005). The strengths approach: A strengths based resource for sharing power and creating change. Bendigo, Victoria: St. Luke'south Innovative Resources.Google Scholar
McEwan, A.B. , Tsey, Thou. , McCalman, J. , & Travers, H.J. (2010). Empowerment and change management in Ancient organisations: A example study. Australian Wellness Review, 34 (iii), 360–367. doi:10.1071/ah08696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGorry, P. (2017). Youth mental health and mental wealth: Reaping the rewards. Australasian Psychiatry 25 (2), 101–103. doi:ten.1177/1039856217694768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meredith, S. , & Ryan, K. (2014). Supporting workers in an Indigenous boarding school program: An APS interest group volunteer partnership. InPsych: The Message of the Australian Psychological Order Ltd, 36 (2), 38.Google Scholar
Murray, North. , Low, B. , Hollis, C. , Cross, A. , & Davis, S. (2007). Coordinated school health programs and academic achievement: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of School Health, 77, 589–600. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00238.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searles, A. , Whiteside, Thou. , McCalman, J. , Tsey, Yard. , & Doran, C. (2012). ACT for kids: Evaluation of the family unit wellbeing initiative delivered to condom-house staff. Report commissioned by Act for Kids, Newcastle and Cairns. Retrieved 23 January 2017 from: https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/31402/.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. (2015). Transition from remote ethnic community to boarding school: The Lockhart river experience. UNESCO Observatory Multi-Disciplinary Journal in the Arts, 4 (ane), 1–15.Google Scholar
Teddlie, C. , & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Tsey, K. , & Every, A. (2000). Evaluating Aboriginal empowerment programs – The case of Family Wellbeing. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 24, 509–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsey, K. , Whiteside, M. , Daley, S. , Deemal, A. , Gibson, T. , Cadet-James, Y. , . . . Haswell-Elkins, M.R. (2004). Adapting the 'family wellbeing' empowerment program to the needs of remote Indigenous school children. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 29 (2), 112–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsey, K. , Whiteside, 1000. , Haswell-Elkins, M. , Bainbridge, R. , Buck-James, Y. , & Wilson, A. (2010). Empowerment and Indigenous Australian health: A synthesis of findings from family wellbeing formative research. Health & Social Care in the Community, 18 (2), 169–179. doi:x.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00885.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ungar, One thousand. (2012). The social ecology of resilience. A handbook of theory and practice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Wang, M. , & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents' perceptions of school environment, appointment, and academic accomplishment in eye school. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 633–662. doi:10.3102/0002831209361209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worsley, L. (2014). Building resilience in three Australian High Schools, using the resilience doughnut framework. In Prince-Embury, Due south. & Saklofske, D. (Ed.), Resilience interventions for youth in various populations (pp. 217–257). New York Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, M.A. (2010). Natural mentors, mental health, and risk behaviors: A longitudinal analysis of African American adolescents transitioning into adulthood. American Periodical of Customs Psychology, 46 (ane–2), 36–48. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9325-x.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M.A. , Stoddard, Due south.A. , Eisman, A.B. , Caldwell, C.H. , Aiyer, S.Thousand. , & Miller, A. (2013). Adolescent resilience: Promotive factors for informing prevention. Child development perspectives. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Zubrick, Southward. , Silburn, S. , Lawrence, D. , Mitrou, F. , Dalby, R. , Blair, E. , . . . Cox, A. (2005). The social and emotional wellbeing of Aboriginal children and young people: Summary booklet. Perth: Telethon Institute for Child Health Research and Curtin University of Engineering.Google Scholar
Source: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/australian-journal-of-indigenous-education/article/strengthening-the-capacity-of-education-staff-to-support-the-wellbeing-of-indigenous-students-in-boarding-schools-a-participatory-action-research-study/460DA62DEEBD7707D103D13A83DE213F